Dr. Paul’s Worldviews

The Book of Romans: Episode 2: The Apostle Paul

The Apostle Paul is the author of Romans; very few, if any, dispute that fact. But, what do we really know about Paul and where do we get our information? Also, what about the critics of Paul? Was Paul a loose canon and a renegade when it came to his brand of Christianity? Was there are wall of separation between him and Jesus? Did he ever meet Jesus, whether before Jesus' crucifixion or afterward? Some seem to think so. Join Dr. Paul as he begins his exposition of the Roman letter by taking a brief look at the Apostle Paul's life, including his interaction with the person of Jesus, and then Dr. Paul's rebuttal of the Apostle's critics.
 
Questions & Comments: podcast@capro.info

The Book of Romans: Episode 1: Introduction

The Apostle Paul's letter to the Romans is the most profound, insightful, and theologically stimulating treatise in the New Testament. Not only have individual lives been transformed by reading it, whole cultures have been "Reformed" by putting into practice its instruction. In a world where so many people are clamoring for answers, whether about government corruption, lawlessness, and "climate change," the Book of Romans stands out as a shining beacon amid the darkness. Please join Dr. Paul as he begins his exposition through what some have labeled "The Christian Constitution." Your soul will be glad you did.

Why Not Roman Catholicism? Tradition and the Bible (Cont.)

In Part 3 in this series of podcasts about Roman Catholicism, Dr. Paul takes a look at the Roman Catholic doctrine of Tradition and the Bible. As will become evident, despite all the ”lip service” concerning the Bible, the Roman Catholic Church actually subordinates the Bible beneath its ”Traditions.” In that respect, the Bible not really an authority at all in matters of faith and practice. It becomes a springboard, instead, to all kinds of anti-biblical, anti-Christian teaching.

Why Not Roman Catholicism? Tradition and the Bible

In Part 3 in this series of podcasts about Roman Catholicism, Dr. Paul takes a look at the Roman Catholic doctrine of Tradition and the Bible. As will become evident, despite all the ”lip service” concerning the Bible, the Roman Catholic Church actually subordinates the Bible beneath its ”Traditions.” In that respect, the Bible not really an authority at all in matters of faith and practice. It becomes a springboard, instead, to all kinds of anti-biblical, anti-Christian teaching.

Why Not Roman Catholicism? Pretentious Priesthood and Accursed Gospel

Dr. Paul continues his analysis and explanation answering the question on why Roman Catholicism is not a viable option for those who might consider it a fair representation of Christianity. First, he looks at Roman Catholicism’s priesthood, which has absolutely no resemblance to the priesthood found in the Old Testament, nor the priesthood of believers found in the New Testament. Second, Dr. Paul examines the Roman Catholic idea of the gospel. Time permitting, he will show how tradition corrupts both.

Why Not Roman Catholicism? The Quadrinity and False Jesus

There are billions of human beings that are a part of the Roman Catholic Church. Millions of others are contemplating on joining the RCC this year, mainly because they believe that Roman Catholicism offers the closest option of being authentic Christianity. But, is that necessarily the case? Is Roman Catholicism a Christian entity OR does it promote heretical teaching at the most basic levels of who God is, who Jesus is, and a less than priestly leadership to make it something other than Christian?

Reconstructing the Deconstructionist: Part 3

Dr. Paul finishes his critique of the deconstructionist fad by discussing four faulty presuppositions that drive it.
1. Pastoral/church leader neglect in equipping the saints for the work of the ministry.
2. Damning biblical illiteracy among those who claim to be "Christians."
3. Falsely assuming that "good works" are what makes a Christian.
4. A brazen declaration that God has not spoken.

Reconstructing the Deconstructionist: Part 2

In this episode, Dr. Paul reconstructs the deconstructionist arguments by pointing out what he/she must presuppose in order to cling to his/her false ideology.
1. Too many people falsely equate a particular religious experience or edifice with being Christian.
2. Too many people falsely assume that once they "deconstruct" their "Christianity," they are no longer religious, and hence are purely rational, logical, or reasonable.
3. Too many people falsely assume that the words of the Bible can be twisted or contorted every which way, and that their "interpretation" is as correct, good, and virtuous as anyone's.

Reconstructing the Deconstructionist Ideology PLUS An Off-topic Call-in Caller

Dr. Paul reconstructs the deconstructionist ideology by pointing out the many fallacious presuppositions the deconstructionist has adopted to try and make it sound plausible. By pointing out the fallacies of assuming that person rearing in a Christian home makes one a Christian, that everyone inherently possesses unbridled, unhindered "free will," and that personal experiences or church membership makes a person a Christian, Dr. Paul shows from Scripture that none of those things are true, and hence the deconstructionist has deceived him- or herself.
Also, Dr. Paul turns relationship counselor toward the end of the program when a young man calls in for advice. Who would have thunk it? Dr. Paul supplants Dr. Phil.

Can Anyone ”Deconstruct” From His Christianity?

It is becoming a growing fad among many who seem to think they were once Christians, and now because they are enlightened, reasonable, or logical, they are no longer Christians. Christianity is a ”myth” to them. They are rational and no longer religious. But, have any one of them truly ”deconstructed,” much less ”deconverted” from Christianity? Or have they simply been fed a line of diabolic nonsense from some secular humanist philosophy professor, coupled with egregious discipleship at their former churches, and are now useful idiots (in the biblical sense) for the "Liberal" (a misnomer) agenda?